North v South: Tim Bresnan & Liam Dawson among eight computer picks

England internationals Tim Bresnan, Harry Gurney and Liam Dawson are among the eight automatic choices for the inaugural North v South 50-over series in the United Arab Emirates next March.
Ben Duckett, Lewis Gregory, Matt Coles, Graeme White and Tim Groenewald will also play in the three-match event.

They have been selected using the Professional Cricketers' Association's Most Valuable Player ratings formula.

The remaining players will be chosen by the England selectors.

The PCA MVP Rankings system identifies the match-winners and key influencers of matches by using a formula that measures each player's total contribution.

It takes into account conditions, quality of opposition, captaincy, strike rates as well as runs scored and wickets taken.

The eight men selected represent the top four England-qualified players in each region from this season's One-Day Cup.

Hampshire all-rounder Dawson, who made his Twenty20 international debut earlier this season, topped the rankings with 128 points, two ahead of fellow left-arm spinner White of Northamptonshire.

Kent all-rounder Coles finished third on 122 points, nine ahead of Glamorgan batsman Colin Ingram, who was ineligible for selection as he is a former South Africa international who plays as a non-overseas player under the Kolpak ruling.

Somerset's Gregory, another all-rounder, took fifth place, followed by Nottinghamshire left-arm seamer Gurney, who made the last of his 10 one-day international appearances for England in December 2014.

Also selected by the computer after finishing in the top eight were experienced Yorkshire all-rounder Bresnan and Northants batsman Duckett, who recently hit 220 not out from 131 balls for England Lions against Sri Lanka A.

Somerset seamer Groenewald, who finished 17th in the rankings, completes the line-up as he was the fourth highest eligible player from the South Group.

A first-class North v South fixture was part of the English calendar between 1836 and 1961.

Source: http://www.bbc.com/sport/cricket/36967587

Scientists Harness Quantum Physics to Build a Programmable Computer

Scientists engineered a high-tech computer that can run several simple programs by harnessing the relationships between tiny particles, or quantum mechanics, according to a new report Wednesday.
The work represents a leap in the field of so-called quantum computers, which store information differently than traditional machines, computing experts said.

Classical computers use binary bits of information, whose values alternate between 0 and 1, to store data. Quantum computers use smaller units—“qubits”—which can simultaneously be 0 and 1. That duality underpins their rapidity and potential supremacy over conventional devices like laptops and servers.

The new device combines magnets, lasers and five individual ions, or charged atoms, trapped in single file. Each atom represents singular qubits. The team of researchers, at the University of Maryland in College Park, used the mechanism to run three different basic algorithms, including a primitive version of the algorithm that underlies encryption technology.

“It’s wonderful work,” said Krysta Svore, a research manager at Microsoft Research, Microsoft Corp. ’s experimental arm, who wasn’t involved with the study.

Government organizations, academic labs and companies like Alphabet Inc. subsidiary Google, Microsoft and International Business Machines Corp. believe quantum machines will facilitate advances in materials science, chemistry, space exploration and artificial intelligence. They are investing millions on developing so-called universal quantum computers that could execute any program without tweaking the hardware on which that software runs.

The new prototype, described in the journal Nature, is a step in that direction—“a very clear demonstration of flexible programmability and universality on a single hardware platform,” said Mark Saffman, a University of Wisconsin-Madison physicist who wasn’t involved in the work.
The lead researcher, Chris Monroe, is using the technology to launch a startup dubbed ionQ Inc., according to the paper’s first author, graduate student Shantanu Debnath.

Previous attempts have made strides toward, but haven’t quite achieved, such versatility, said Daniel Lidar, the director of the University of Southern California Center for Quantum Information Science & Technology in Los Angeles.

To run their algorithms, the researchers devised the equivalent of a quantum-scale laser-light show. They split a single laser beam and precisely varied the times and intensities at which each mini-ray struck atomic qubits. Their ensuing vibrations can entangle any pair such that they behave like a unit. Such particle pas-de-deux give quantum machines their speed.

Depending on the operation, qubits light up a certain way; a detector sees that fluorescence and uses it to read the information the qubits hold.

Simple calculations had an accuracy of 98%. For more complex ones, like the encryption algorithm, accuracy plummeted to roughly 60%. In the quantum world, scientists aim for precisions higher than 99%. At that level, they can start harnessing quantum mechanics to correct errors that naturally build up in quantum systems, an important hurdle to making them workable.

They haven’t yet shown they can do that, said Hartmut Neven, a director of engineering at Google specializing in quantum computing. Mr. Debnath says they are tackling the problem.

The researchers must also prove they can build a reliable system bigger than five qubits, said Dr. Saffman and others. Such scalability is among the biggest quandaries in quantum computing. To solve commercially interesting problems that can’t be cracked in a timely manner with classical computers, experts estimate somewhere between hundreds to millions of qubits will be necessary, depending on complexity. Most experimental systems have handled only a handful.

D-Wave Systems Inc. has a 1,152-qubit system, though scientists have called into question the reliability and “quantum-ness.” D-Wave stands by the quality of its product, which it says is used by companies like Lockheed Martin and Google, according to CEO Vern Brownell.

There is disagreement over what flavor of qubits will ultimately dominate: individual trapped ions in a line, like the ones in the new study, or superconducting qubits, which are essentially a collection of atoms acting together as a quantum unit. Commercial companies like Google and IBM prefer superconducting qubits because they are faster and can be manufactured similarly to conventional chips. Trapped-ion qubits are more reliable, but may be difficult to scale. (Microsoft is going after an altogether different approach.)

Isaac Chuang, a quantum-information scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, thinks it is likely future quantum machines will fuse several technologies. Such hybrids are already emerging. In June, Google published a study, also in Nature, describing a prototype that reliably merged two architectures. That machine was also regarded as a step toward a multipurpose quantum computer.

Write to Daniela Hernandez at daniela.hernandez@wsj.com

Source:http://www.wsj.com/articles/scientists-harness-quantum-physics-to-build-a-programmable-computer-1470243605

Why Apple Wants You to Believe iPad Pro Is a Computer

It’s a new reality.

Apple really, really wants you to believe that its iPad Pro is a computer—and there’s good reason for that.

The tech giant recently released an iPad Pro ad called “What’s a Computer?” In it, the company extols the virtues of its iPad Pro, a high-end tablet designed first for corporate users, showcasing how with help from its keyboard-cover combination, it can act like any notebook you’ve used before.
“Just when you think you know what a computer is, you see a keyboard that can just get out of the way. And a screen you can touch—and even write on,” the ad’s narrator says as iPad Pro is shown in-use. “When you see a computer that can do all that, it might just make you wonder, ‘Hey, what else could it do?'”

The ad ends with “Imagine what your computer could do if your computer was an iPad Pro.”
Even on Apple’s AAPL 1.32% website, the company makes the pitch that the iPad Pro is a computer, calling the device “Super. Computer.


To many, Apple’s argument might seem odd. The iPad, which launched in 2010, has long been known as a tablet, and has been bundled in every analyst report on tablets since its inception. Now, though, Apple wants customers to believe that at least one of its models is really a computer.
Admittedly, making such an argument could be difficult. The iPad Pro is running a mobile operating system in iOS that customers would find elsewhere in its iPad mini and iPad Air 2 tablets, as well as the company’s line of iPhones. Apple’s computers, named Macs, run on a different, desktop-friendly operating system.

But pitching customers that an iPad Pro is really a computer could be critical to Apple overcoming what has been a troubled tablet division while appealing to what appears to be a growing customer base interested in so-called two-in-one hybrid devices. Indeed, never before has the line between computers and tablets been so blurred.

What exactly is a hybrid?

Defining exactly what a two-in-one hybrid isn’t even simple. While they’re nearly all running on Windows and each features a touchscreen, they come in a slew of variants. PC makers like Dell, Lenovo, and others, sell devices that have hinged keyboards, allowing them to whip around and use the device as a tablet or as a standard notebook with ease. Others, like Acer, offer products with detachable screens that similarly allow them to be used as both a notebook or tablet.

The only reasonable definition for a hybrid computer, therefore, is that they should be convertible from a tablet to a notebook.
In that respect, then, Apple might be right that its iPad Pro is a computer. After all, if a hybrid is a traditional computer, the iPad Pro isn’t all that different, even if it’s running a mobile operating system instead of a desktop operating system.
Characterizing the iPad Pro as a hybrid (and making customers believe it) also helps Apple fill one, huge gap in its product lineup: it’s the only major computer maker that doesn’t sell a traditional hybrid.

According to research firm IDC, hybrids are boosting an otherwise troubled PC market. In March, IDC said that the PC market is “bottoming out.” Soon after, IDC reported that hybrids would see shipments grow, despite declines in both the PC and tablet industries.
PC makers witnessing that growing demand is likely why so many companies are launching more hybrids than ever before.
It’s also likely why Apple wants to demonstrate how its iPad Pro can transition from a tablet and notebook with ease.

Source : http://fortune.com/2016/08/03/apple-ipad-pro-computer/